Officially Supported By: dco_logo_land_webonly_k dcb_logo_land_webonly_k
Official Media Partners for: dPRTE_logo_land_webonly_k

After a nine-hour discussion lawmakers have failed to secure an agreement on the future of the European Defence Fund.

Discussions surrounding the European Defence Fund (EDF) have revealed the extent of disagreements between Ministers and MEPs. Tension arose over the overall goal of the fund and what outcome it would have for European Defence in general.

The EDF was first commissioned late in 2016. At the time Vice President for Jobs, Growth, Investment, and Competitiveness Jyrki Katainen said: “The Fund will act as a catalyst for a strong European defence industry which develops cutting-edge, fully interoperable technologies and equipment.”

“Member States will remain in the driving seat, get better value for their money – and ultimately see their influence increased.”

Since then, almost every aspect of the fund has come into question. Brexit is an obvious spanner in the works, with questions arising over whether non-EU members will be allowed to contribute.

One prominent point of contention was ethics. Legal experts expressed concern that the fund may violate the Lisbon treaty, which explicitly prohibits military projects funded from within the EU budget.

Questions were raised on the ethical ramifications of research into autonomous weapons and the potential for the export of arms. German Green MEP Reinhard Bütikofer described the decision not to exclude funding ‘weapons of mass destruction’ as ‘shameful’.

He warned that the EDF should not be used for nuclear rearmament ‘at any cost’. Legal experts warned that if an objective is not clearly set out it could face more lengthy negotiations and objections.

Less contentious objections include disagreements over how the fund will be managed. It is still undecided if the fund will be controlled by the commission or under collaboration by member states.

No agreement has been reached on the eligibility criteria for nations to participate. The American Chamber of Commerce in Brussels warned that restrictions on non-members will make participation ‘virtually impossible’.

With Brexit negotiations ongoing, there appears to be no clear solution in sight. Some leaders are encouraging Britain to remain a part of the fund, but that may depend on what restrictions are put in place.

If you would like to join our community and read more articles like this then please click here.

Brexit Defence Funding ethics Europe European Commision European Defence Action Plan European Defence Fund European Defence Research Programme

Post written by: Ciara Houghton


Become a Stakeholder today and benefit from an exclusive marketing package which will allow you to:

  • Engage with active defence buyers and key supply chain partners
  • Create your own branded micro-site which within Defence Online which is managed by you
  • Have a dedicated Digital Account Manager to help enhance your Stakeholder page
  • Promote your news, products, press releases, eBooks and Videos as a Defence Online partner which feeds through to our homepage and social media channels
  • Have your company promoted on our partner website Defence Contracts Online (DCO)
  • All news promoted in mynewsdesk, a major hub for all of our news articles which enables news to be picked up from trade magazines, national newspapers and many other publications which offers extra exposure at no additional cost!

Contact us today or call us on 0845 557 1315 to take advantage of this exclusive marketing package



February 15, 2019

New report shows the extent of sexual harassment in the army

A new report has highlighted the number of servicewomen who have experienced sexual harassment in the armed forces. New figures from

February 12, 2019

Land - Defence Secretary sets out global vision for UK’s defence

The Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson has set out his vision for the future role of the UK’s Armed Forces following